Recently, I discovered an interesting phenomenon—the incentive mechanism of the creation platform is quietly upgrading. The past half month has been a busy holiday period, and my posting frequency has decreased significantly. As a result, my creator income for this month actually increased by 50%.



After some calculation, this is already the third time since last year that I have felt an incentive boost, and this time the increase is the largest. Honestly, this reverse incentive model is quite interesting—less output but more income, which feels like the content ecosystem is adjusting its weighting logic.

Even more exaggerated are those daily update experts and creators focused on traffic operations—what kind of earnings can they make in a month? This number should be very interesting. It seems that in 2026, the platform is really increasing its investment in creator distribution.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 01-06 07:23
Hmm... this is a typical "Schrödinger's bull market." Less output but more income, is the platform playing a reverse operation on the supply and demand curve? Honestly, this round of weight adjustments by the platform feels a bit like Mr. Dong Guo's style—shifting the incentive mechanism from traffic-driven to quality-driven. But who can define what quality really is? Daily content creators might be about to lose their jobs. With reverse incentives in place, the entire ecosystem's ROI logic collapses. This is definitely a distorted practice of the Web3 decentralization philosophy. Hey, isn't this just like the sponsorship system in the Da Vinci era? Less production but higher prices. Monopoly value theory is at work here. What is the platform really doing? Are they just treating creators as cash machines? I really want to see if there will be a fourth round after this, given the biggest adjustment so far.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 01-06 07:18
Less sending actually earns more, this logic doesn't make sense, bro.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 01-03 07:53
Fewer posts but more earnings, this logic is a bit crazy. Has the platform started to reverse the trend?
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlockervip
· 01-03 07:50
This is outrageous—producing less actually earns more? It feels like the platform is secretly adjusting something.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTonguevip
· 01-03 07:50
Bro, these numbers are a bit crazy. Sending less actually earns more? Suspecting that the platform is testing a new algorithm internally.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectualvip
· 01-03 07:40
Lying flat actually earns more? That logic is a bit absurd, but I believe it.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugeevip
· 01-03 07:31
Damn, this reverse incentive logic is pretty interesting. Is it about filtering content quality or just purely reducing costs?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)