Building an ecosystem can't rely solely on screens, and I am increasingly convinced of this.
Looking at the trends of Tezos over the past few years, you can feel it — every time community members meet offline, it sparks something different. Discussions become deeper, ideas for collaboration emerge more quickly. Accounts on the other side of the screen turn into real people, strangers become like-minded partners. This transformation is hard to quantify with data, but everyone who has participated understands.
That's also why large-scale blockchain projects often invest in offline activities. It's not just about brand promotion, but about building genuine network effects. When builders, developers, and investors meet face-to-face around a table, the subsequent communication efficiency and trust are on a completely different level.
If a Web3 project wants to establish a long-term foothold, having only technical highlights and concepts is far from enough. Community cohesion and real-world connections are becoming invisible indicators of competitiveness. Offline engagement is not an optional add-on; it is an essential part of ecosystem operation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMortgage
· 01-04 01:44
This is the real truth. Only when we meet offline do we know who is really working.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 01-03 06:54
Really, meeting in person offline is worth ten times more than a group chat.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 01-03 06:47
Meeting in person is truly different; the screen is just a barrier, and no matter how many group chats there are, it's all pointless.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFan
· 01-03 06:36
The moment we meet offline, there's truly nothing that can replace it. Compared to the ID on the screen, the sense of trust from a real person is just different.
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmare
· 01-03 06:35
I agree that the account truly comes to life only when we meet offline.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 01-03 06:34
You're right. I haven't attended many offline events in the past two years, and there is indeed a difference. No matter how loudly they hype it up on the screen, sharing a meal at a table is more genuine. Trust really has to be built face-to-face.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-03 06:30
A screen is still just a screen; only face-to-face meetings can verify each other's true protocol architecture... In this regard, Tezos really convinced me.
Building an ecosystem can't rely solely on screens, and I am increasingly convinced of this.
Looking at the trends of Tezos over the past few years, you can feel it — every time community members meet offline, it sparks something different. Discussions become deeper, ideas for collaboration emerge more quickly. Accounts on the other side of the screen turn into real people, strangers become like-minded partners. This transformation is hard to quantify with data, but everyone who has participated understands.
That's also why large-scale blockchain projects often invest in offline activities. It's not just about brand promotion, but about building genuine network effects. When builders, developers, and investors meet face-to-face around a table, the subsequent communication efficiency and trust are on a completely different level.
If a Web3 project wants to establish a long-term foothold, having only technical highlights and concepts is far from enough. Community cohesion and real-world connections are becoming invisible indicators of competitiveness. Offline engagement is not an optional add-on; it is an essential part of ecosystem operation.