A major exchange recently announced an extension of monitoring tags for four tokens: ACA, D, DATA, and FLOW. This move is enough to prompt holders to reassess their positions.
Monitoring tags may sound mild, but their actual impact is quite severe. The signal they send to the market is very clear—these tokens carry higher risks, and if improvements are not made, delisting is a real possibility. This is not just a warning but a credit deduction within the entire trading ecosystem.
From a chain reaction perspective, once tagged, liquidity begins to shrink. Traders seeing risk alerts will accelerate their exit, naturally putting pressure on the market. A more realistic concern is that if this major exchange actually proceeds with delisting, other platforms are likely to follow suit, creating an irreversible pattern.
Looking back at history, very few projects that have been tagged have been able to remove the label and continue active development. Most eventually fade out of sight. This is not alarmist talk but a market reality.
If you currently hold these tokens, now is the time to seriously evaluate. Has the project team made substantial improvements? Is the community still active? Are there flaws in the tokenomics model? All these factors need to be reconsidered. Keep a close eye on project updates to see if they introduce targeted solutions. If no positive changes are observed, early action is often the more rational choice. The exchange’s monitoring measures are not just for show—when it’s time to cut losses, decisive action is necessary.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleMaid
· 8h ago
Monitoring tags are death notices, stop fooling yourself.
View OriginalReply0
MrDecoder
· 18h ago
Here we go again, monitoring tag = countdown to death...
---
I already left DATA a long time ago, and it seems that was really a wise move.
---
Liquidity shrinks and it's over, this round really depends on who can run faster.
---
The history is right here, those who remove the tags are rare, aren't you going to cut your losses quickly?
---
Did the project team really come up with something? I didn't see anything...
---
The delisting wave is coming, other exchanges will definitely follow suit.
---
Those holding these four coins should reflect now, don't wait for death.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 23h ago
Another wave? It feels like these monitoring tags are just a countdown to death. How many have actually survived in history?
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurker
· 23h ago
Here we go again... Monitoring tags are just a countdown to death, the history is all here
---
I've known for a long time that DATA was off, the sooner you exit the better
---
Wait, among these four coins, is anyone still stubbornly holding on... Hurry up and run
---
Really, once exchanges put on labels, there's basically no turning back, don't hold onto false hopes everyone
---
So the question is, why can't these project teams just understand this
---
Looking at this article, it's clearly trying to discourage... I think there's some truth to it
---
When liquidity shrinks, no one is willing to take over, that's the most heartbreaking part
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 23h ago
Coming back with this again? Every time you say you'll take it down, the process gets delayed by half a year. How many actually get cut?
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 23h ago
Another round of cutting leeks, I’ve long since lost interest in these four coins.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 23h ago
Another round of chopping, holders must be really panicking this time
---
Monitoring tags are basically death signals given by exchanges, and there's little chance of turning things around afterward
---
That DATA should have been taken down long ago, the community has been completely cooled off
---
The history is right there; almost no coins marked have survived, don't hold onto false hopes
---
In my opinion, cutting losses early is the best strategy, otherwise waiting until you're forced to sell will be even more painful
---
I haven't touched any of these four coins; looks like I chose correctly, haha
---
Is anyone still waiting for these projects to turn around? Wake up
---
When liquidity shrinks, prices start free-falling; if you run late, you can't pull out
---
Other platforms will definitely follow suit; this is a domino effect, no one dares to take over
A major exchange recently announced an extension of monitoring tags for four tokens: ACA, D, DATA, and FLOW. This move is enough to prompt holders to reassess their positions.
Monitoring tags may sound mild, but their actual impact is quite severe. The signal they send to the market is very clear—these tokens carry higher risks, and if improvements are not made, delisting is a real possibility. This is not just a warning but a credit deduction within the entire trading ecosystem.
From a chain reaction perspective, once tagged, liquidity begins to shrink. Traders seeing risk alerts will accelerate their exit, naturally putting pressure on the market. A more realistic concern is that if this major exchange actually proceeds with delisting, other platforms are likely to follow suit, creating an irreversible pattern.
Looking back at history, very few projects that have been tagged have been able to remove the label and continue active development. Most eventually fade out of sight. This is not alarmist talk but a market reality.
If you currently hold these tokens, now is the time to seriously evaluate. Has the project team made substantial improvements? Is the community still active? Are there flaws in the tokenomics model? All these factors need to be reconsidered. Keep a close eye on project updates to see if they introduce targeted solutions. If no positive changes are observed, early action is often the more rational choice. The exchange’s monitoring measures are not just for show—when it’s time to cut losses, decisive action is necessary.