The melody of the market always repeats, but each time it sounds different.



Recently, Bitcoin has fallen from a high of $126,000 all the way down to below $90,000. This sharp correction has led many to ask: Is the bear market really here?

The four-year cycle theory has always been a "belief" within the community. The halving event is seen as a regulator of market rhythm, but when you really analyze the data, you'll find the story is far from that simple.

**What does history say?**

In 2012, during the first halving, the block reward dropped from 50 to 25 coins. Afterwards, Bitcoin surged from $4 to $1,200—an increase of 300 times. Then came a year of bear market correction, with prices halved by 84%.

In 2016, the second halving occurred. The reward changed from 25 to 12.5 coins. This time, Bitcoin skyrocketed from $200 to $20,000, a 100-fold increase, followed by an 83% decline.

In 2020, the third halving took place. The new reward of 6.25 coins was accompanied by a rise from $3,500 to $70,000—20 times growth. Unsurprisingly, it then fell by 79%.

The data is clear: after each halving cycle, there is celebration, followed by deep corrections. This time seems to be cycling through the same rhythm. But is it really that simple?

The current market structure and liquidity environment are vastly different from the past. Institutional entry, ETF products, and the booming derivatives market—all are changing the game rules. Traditional cycle prediction models may need recalibration.
BTC1.49%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ser_ngmivip
· 20h ago
Is history repeating itself? Then why do I keep getting cut every time? LOL
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGasvip
· 23h ago
Is history a spiral ascent or a circular cycle? On-chain data speaks for itself, but I bet that institutional arbitrage behavior has already rewritten this script. The halving cycle theory is indeed outdated. We are now in an era of liquidity game equilibrium, and high gas environmentalists are expressing despair. Another "different" cycle, ultimately, is just a rational expectation reshaping after market efficiency improvements—boring. The recent drop from 12.6K to 90K is less a bear market and more a domino effect of derivatives liquidation. It's quite interesting. Cycle believers should wake up; the interaction cost gap between institutions and retail investors has long torn apart that simple model. Every time they say this time is different, but it's always the same. The gamble is whether a new game pattern can be established before the next halving. Currently, it's uncertain. Honestly, traditional cycle predictions are becoming less and less relevant for the current situation, unless you can monitor whale on-chain wallet behaviors in real-time.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImpostervip
· 23h ago
Singing the old song of halving again, but you're right, this time it really seems different... The institutions are no longer outsiders.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFundvip
· 23h ago
It sounds good, but the halving cycle theory should be updated now. With so many institutional players involved, it's a completely different game.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseurvip
· 23h ago
Talking about the four-year cycle again, but institutions and ETFs really changed the game. This time is different.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)