2026-01-03 05:20:32

Ever considered why Sharpe ratio might edge out Sortino ratio for portfolio performance evaluation? The distinction matters more than most traders realize. Sharpe penalizes all volatility equally, while Sortino focuses purely on downside risk—two fundamentally different approaches to the same problem. If you can articulate the strengths of Sharpe over Sortino in practical trading scenarios, drop your analysis below. Keen to see how traders here approach this classic quant dilemma.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DataOnlooker

· 23h ago

The Sharpe ratio is actually just a lazy indicator that cuts all volatility the same way; it's not really usable in real trading... Sortino is the real way to go.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 23h ago

It has been proven that Sharpe is more convincing in high-frequency volatile markets. I verified this with three months of real-world data, and the Sortino approach, which only considers downside risk, is actually a case of "selective blindness."

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 23h ago

Laughing out loud, the difference between Sharpe and Sortino is like the difference between a leek and cutting a leek—one penalizes all volatility, and the other only cares about declines. Anyway, we're retail investors who are always the ones being cut.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 23h ago

Honestly, the Sharpe ratio is a bit outdated. It's already 2024, and you're still fussing over this? Downside risk is the real pain point. Sortino? I don't even understand it... Never mind, I don't want to argue.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletGuardian