2026-01-03 03:22:31

At the beginning of the year, I just couldn't understand it—among the most boring things in the Bitcoin ecosystem is definitely the oracle. Honestly, that thing is just like a utility pole—useful, but it doesn't sound very attractive. As a result, by the end of the year, reality gave me a harsh slap. Those things I couldn't understand were actually because I didn't see the whole picture of Bitcoin's financialization.

After thinking it through, I realized that the Bitcoin ecosystem is a bit like a deep-sea submarine. APRO is not just an accessory; it's the oxygen circulation system inside the cabin. When playing in shallow waters, no one feels how critical oxygen is; but once you dive into the deep sea of BTCFi, without it, you can't last more than a minute.

When evaluating new things at first, people tend to be arrogant. We're already used to Ethereum's sophisticated oracle system, so looking at APRO is like looking at another "vegetable price reporting" system. This idea itself is flawed because Bitcoin and Ethereum are fundamentally two different logics. Now, with Bitcoin Layer2 flourishing everywhere, liquidity has fragmented into pieces. In this situation, having an "eye" that can clearly see where all these fragments are becomes a necessity.

Why can APRO convince people? Because it has completed the transformation from "weather forecaster" to "nerve center." It's not just about reporting Bitcoin prices; it relies on a unique asset proof mechanism to verify in real-time where cross-chain assets are and whether they truly exist. Remember the liquidation storm in Q3 this year? A batch of protocols still using traditional oracles suffered big losses due to delayed quotes and slippage. In contrast, lending protocols using APRO almost escaped unscathed thanks to millisecond-level response speed. That moment truly made everyone realize the real value of this infrastructure for the ecosystem.

BTC-0.77%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LeekCutter

· 01-06 02:51

At the beginning of the year, I was really fed up with APRO, thinking it was just a fancy trick. Now I understand, this is the lifeline of BTCFi. I saw clearly the liquidation wave in the third quarter, where traditional oracles were slaughtered bloodily, while APRO responded in milliseconds and escaped unscathed. The gap is truly enormous. Honestly, it's still my own incompetence. I always try to apply the ETH framework to BTC, but they are completely different. The true test comes at critical moments. Infrastructure is like that—no one cares normally, but when a crisis hits, it becomes a lifesaver. Layer2 is so fragmented that there really needs to be something to monitor in real-time, or you can't play the game. Forget it, admitting I don't understand is better than pretending to know. Now I believe.

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 01-05 11:37

At the beginning of the year, looking at APRO really wasn't exciting. Now looking back, I understand what it means to be hit in the face. --- Without BTCFi Deep Sea, it couldn't last a second. --- It really is habitual arrogance; Ethereum's way of thinking simply doesn't apply to Bitcoin. --- That wave of liquidation in Q3 was the real textbook; we survived using APRO. --- From weather forecasters to neural centers, this is what infrastructure should look like. --- Liquidity is shattered everywhere; you need to have a clear eye to see it. --- Milliseconds vs. latency, the difference is more than just reaction speed. --- I really misunderstood before; it's not a matter of quotes. --- Two sets of logic simply cannot be mixed. --- The value of infrastructure can only be seen at critical moments.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDivorcer

· 01-03 03:49

Facepalm acknowledged, I indeed underestimated it. --- At the beginning of the year, I also thought oracles were boring to death, but now they are really awesome. --- So APRO is that life-saving oxygen tube? Got it. --- During the Q3 clearing storm, those using traditional oracles definitely suffered big losses; millisecond differences mean life or death. --- Ethereum's system is fine to use if it works, but with so many fragmented Bitcoin Layer2 solutions, a "watchful eye" is indeed needed. --- From utility poles to neural centers, APRO's recent evolution is quite aggressive. --- Asset proof mechanisms sound reliable, but how they actually perform in practice is the real test. --- Wait, are we still arguing about the importance of oracles? I thought that topic was already beaten to death. --- For BTCFi to take off, the infrastructure definitely needs to keep up; this article finally clarified that.

View OriginalReply0

nft_widow

· 01-03 03:49

Good comeback, this is what Web3 should look like—initially it seemed boring, but then I realized they are the main course. BTCFi really needs this kind of "nerve center," otherwise Layer2 with more liquidity is just fragmented. That wave of liquidations in the third quarter was exhausting to watch, but luckily I didn't fully stake on old-fashioned oracles. From utility poles to oxygen systems, that was a brilliant analogy; most people just haven't dug deep enough.

View OriginalReply0

PonziDetector

· 01-03 03:44

Haha, this is truly a real slap in the face. At the beginning of the year, I looked down on oracles, and by the end of the year, they had to save the day. That wave of liquidation in the third quarter was indeed intense. Traditional oracles can be deadly with millisecond delays. Now I understand what infrastructure really means. BTCFi is so competitive; without a pair of "eyes" that can see liquidity in real-time, a crash is only a matter of time. A slap in the face is a slap in the face, but at least it prompts reflection, much better than those who refuse to admit it. The deep-sea submarine analogy is clever, but honestly, APRO's popularity is still because other oracles are too weak. That oxygen circulation logic... just hearing it makes me skeptical. It's 2024, and we're still talking about this metaphor? From reporting vegetable prices to neural centers, it sounds impressive, but how well it actually works remains to be seen. The millisecond-level reaction speed is indeed impressive, but has the slippage problem really been fully solved?

View OriginalReply0

NestedFox

· 01-03 03:26

Face-slapping, but at least I learned something. The game of BTCFi is indeed complex; it's not something you can understand from a few articles. Only when it’s really needed do you realize what true necessity is. Other oracles are just weather forecasts; APRO is the oxygen. The group that lost heavily in the third quarter now understands why millisecond-level precision is so critical. Ethereum's gameplay simply can't be applied to Bitcoin, which is ridiculous. But to be honest, Layer2 being so fragmented still makes me a bit anxious; there needs to be something that can truly see through everything.

View OriginalReply0

MysteriousZhang

· 01-03 03:24

Haha, I thought the same at the beginning of the year, but the reality taught me a lesson and made me obedient. Just take the hit, at least now I finally understand. During the third quarter cleanup, traditional oracles really underperformed; a millisecond difference can be a matter of life and death. The BTCFi game is becoming more and more complicated, it's not something that can be solved with a simple "price reporting." Looking back now, I was just too young and too naive; the Ethereum experience doesn't really work here in Bitcoin. Really, with Layer2 so fragmented, without a reliable "eye" watching, a crash is just a matter of time. APRO from oxygen to the central nervous system—this metaphor hit the mark, but we still need to see how it develops next.

View OriginalReply0