2025-12-30 10:39:01

The arbitrage opportunities in Polymarket are actually limited to a few strategies. Recently, I tested the Dump & Hedge approach—the core logic is to quickly intervene when prices drop sharply, then lock in risk-free profits through hedging positions.

It sounds simple, but executing it requires more precision. I directly feed the strategic idea into GPT for in-depth optimization, helping me fine-tune parameters and improve the risk model. After the optimized version is ready, I throw it into Cursor, which generates executable code directly. Now the backtesting data has all been run successfully, and the key metrics look pretty good.

Starting this week, I will conduct small live tests. The initial phase mainly aims to verify signal quality and execution efficiency, checking whether actual slippage and costs align with the model’s expectations. If the data remains stable during this cycle, I’ll consider gradually increasing the volume. The arbitrage opportunities in the market do exist, but the window is very short, so automation is a must.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseVagabond

· 12h ago

This approach sounds good, but real trading slippage is often a killer in backtesting. Will you be able to afford the losses when it happens? --- Dump & Hedge sounds easy, but the real bottleneck is execution speed. One second slower and it's gone. --- Using GPT+Cursor for rapid iteration, I like this idea, but can Polymarket's liquidity really support automated hedging? --- The window period is so short that you still need a bot; manual operation will definitely fail. --- Good backtest data doesn't necessarily mean you'll make money in live trading. I've seen too many cases like this... --- Small trial orders are correct, but should you run several strategies simultaneously to hedge risks? --- I'd like to hear what infrastructure you use for automation—direct exchange connection or an API middleware? --- Basically, it's about exploiting inefficiencies in prediction markets. Don't wait until institutions have fully optimized with AI. --- Parameter tuning is the key step. Have you validated the solutions provided by GPT with a second check?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHuntress

· 12h ago

Backtest data passing ≠ stable live trading, this pitfall has been stepped on by too many people. Slippage is the real killer. The key is how well you control your hedging costs; otherwise, the arbitrage space will be completely eaten up. Honestly, I don't trust GPT-generated code very much. Can the logic run by Cursor withstand extreme market conditions? You need to review this yourself carefully. How short can the window period be to truly reliably capture opportunities, or is it just good-looking backtesting? Small-scale testing is correct; run the data first. Don't be fooled by the model; actual execution efficiency often takes a hit.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 12h ago

Hmm, the GPT+Cursor combination can indeed save a lot of time, but I'm worried that a beautiful backtest might turn into a real trading mess. Good-looking backtest data doesn't mean you won't get slippage and be driven crazy. Dump & Hedge sounds easy, but the window period flashes by in a blink, and you'll be stunned. The cost of automated execution needs to be calculated clearly; don't earn a little and lose a lot. This week, small-scale testing is the right approach—first verify the signals before proceeding.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 12h ago

Sounds good, but I'm more curious about how slippage performs during live trading. That's the real test. Haha, I’ve also tried the GPT+Cursor setup, and sometimes you have to tweak the generated code yourself. Risk-free? Hold on, you need to be cautious when using that term in the crypto world. Risks are always hidden in the details. Backtesting running smoothly is one thing, but live trading is another. Keep going, bro. Many people have heard of this trading strategy, but the key is who can survive the longest.

View OriginalReply0

NewDAOdreamer

· 12h ago

Oops, this routine sounds smooth, but when it actually runs, it's a whole different story. I've had my fair share of slippage nightmares. Wait, you're using GPT+Cursor to generate code directly? Aren't you worried about parameter pitfalls? I've fallen into that trap before. Backtest data looks good, but that doesn't mean the live trading will be stable. The window is so short that a slight delay in response can cause a blow-up. Actually, I think the hardest part of market prediction isn't the strategy itself but latency. Whoever is faster wins. I believe in risk-free arbitrage, but only if you're willing to try small amounts. I definitely need to be more cautious.

View OriginalReply0