Recently, the crypto market has sparked another wave of discussion. A well-known industry figure made a bold prediction: Bitcoin will surge to $750,000 by 2027. This is not just idle talk; there is a complete logic behind it.

In simple terms, the core issue is—global central banks are printing money like crazy, while Bitcoin's supply is fixed.

**The Printing Wave Has Already Started**

What are institutions like the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank doing? To stimulate their sluggish economies, they have launched unprecedented easing cycles. The Federal Reserve is even preparing to push forward with a government bond purchase plan, injecting huge liquidity into the market every month. It sounds grand, but where will this money end up? It certainly won't obediently enter the real economy; instead, it will flood into "safe havens" like a breached dam. Financial markets, commodities, and cryptocurrencies—all will become targets for these funds.

**Scarcity Is King**

In this context, Bitcoin's advantage becomes apparent. Fiat currency has unlimited supply, and devaluation is inevitable. But Bitcoin is different; there are only 21 million in total, and this is set in stone. Moreover, large institutions are aggressively accumulating—companies like Grayscale and MicroStrategy are accelerating their holdings, and many Bitcoins are locked up long-term, reducing liquidity. Plus, historically, about 4 million Bitcoins have been permanently lost due to lost private keys, so the actual circulating supply is far below the theoretical maximum.

This is called "deflationary pressure"—the supply is actually decreasing, while demand may be increasing.

**A Simple Math Problem**

It can be understood like this: the Federal Reserve releases huge amounts of money each month chasing an asset with a supply of less than 10 million coins. When supply exceeds demand, now demand exceeds supply. How can such an extreme imbalance not push prices higher? This is the mathematical logic behind the prediction.

**Risks Exist, but Opportunities Are Greater**

Of course, there is uncertainty regarding regulation. But interestingly, this may accelerate institutional entry. Why? Because once the policy framework becomes clear, large institutions will make big moves—they are not afraid of regulation, but of uncertainty.

For individual investors, it is recommended not to go all-in or completely miss out. A dollar-cost averaging strategy combined with grid trading might be more prudent—allowing participation in this wave of opportunity without being knocked out by single-point risks.

The last sentence is worth remembering: when central banks start printing money like crazy, it’s best to hold some things they cannot create.