Is directly writing stocks onto the blockchain? This topic is increasingly appearing in serious discussions, and the underlying implication is quite clear — traditional capital markets are shaking up their most fundamental elements.



This is not a new story fabricated by a Web3 startup team, nor is it a self-indulgent narrative created by the crypto market to sound innovative. Instead, it is a movement driven collectively by regulators, leading exchanges, and major financial institutions.

How can we tell if a trend is truly happening? Watch when the most conservative players start making room for it. Several signals have emerged almost simultaneously in recent times.

On the regulatory side, there’s no longer any hesitation. They repeatedly emphasize a fact: the legal nature of stocks will not change just because the storage medium shifts from traditional databases to blockchain. Implicitly, they are saying that putting securities on the chain faces no fundamental obstacles.

What about exchanges? They are beginning to seriously consider how tokenized stocks and traditional stocks can be traded and settled together. This is not just theoretical talk but involves developing practical plans.

And those leading RWA platforms? They used to mainly focus on government bonds and cash assets, but now they are officially exploring equity. This was unimaginable a year or two ago. Back then, the questions were still at the technical level — can trading be 24/7? Can assets be sliced and circulated globally?

It’s different now. The discussion is entirely about institutional frameworks: how to register equity? Who is responsible for clearing? Do token holders legally qualify as true shareholders?

Once the discussion reaches this level, it indicates that this is no longer driven solely by market enthusiasm but by a genuine institutional restructuring. Regarding stock RWA, different companies have already taken three completely different paths.
RWA-3.45%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractPlumbervip
· 7h ago
Discussions at the institutional level are truly the main focus; technical issues have become secondary—this shift signal is indeed very clear. However, it depends on how the contract design for permission control and settlement mechanisms is implemented. Once the exploit chain is unlocked, no matter how perfect the legal framework is, it will be useless.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 7h ago
Regulators have spoken, which means it's not just hype. But the problem with this round of institutional restructuring is that—no one truly has a clear idea of who should ultimately pay for liquidation and settlement. History will repeat itself; it all depends on who ends up being the next crop of retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Groupvip
· 7h ago
The conservatives are starting to make way, and this time they are really coming Is it true? Regulators are already speaking? Then we’d better quickly see who is bottom-fishing The institutional issues are already on the table, indicating that technology has long ceased to be a bottleneck Is the on-chain stock thing still far from us? It feels like the next cycle will have to move Three different paths, each acting independently? That’s the most interesting part It sounds like the clearing part is still a pit, and how to define its legal attributes is really the key No more dodging, this word is used perfectly, it really is a change in attitude You can't bet which path will win in the end, but someone will definitely suffer losses
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 7h ago
Really? Regulations are starting to come into play. Is this the new trick to cut leeks again? --- Wait, does this mean stocks are going on the blockchain? Should I throw away these paper certificates? --- Conservatives are all giving their positions. This signal is indeed a bit strong... RWA is about to turn around. --- Discussions are beginning at the institutional level, indicating that this is serious now, no longer just tech guys' self-indulgence. --- Three different paths, it sounds like no one has figured out what to do yet. --- From "Can it be traded 24/7" to "Who is the real shareholder," this shift is a bit shocking.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghostvip
· 7h ago
Wait a minute, does this mean Wall Street has finally admitted defeat? This time it's not just hype, they're really about to change the rules... Regulatory approval is the most decisive signal, everything else is just clouds RWA should have been like this a long time ago, how long has it been delayed? Tokenizing stocks? Honestly, I can't get too excited about it, feels like we still have to wait Institutional issues are the real tough nuts to crack, don't be fooled What exactly are these three paths? We need to see the details to know who will win When big institutions push forward together, this thing becomes much more reliable The statement that the legal attributes remain unchanged is quite key, it gives a reassurance How much of the pie can retail investors get then...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)