In contract trading, many people find themselves in trouble due to operational mistakes. Recently, I came across a case: a trader lost all 4000 USDT in a contract position. After reviewing the case, it was found that the main issues stemmed from several fatal errors—going all-in, chasing gains and cutting losses impulsively, and contrarian bottom-fishing—almost stepping into trading forbidden zones.



Such situations are actually quite common. The key is how to recover from losses and establish a scientific trading system. Someone summarized a practical contract opening framework worth referencing:

**Stage-wise Positioning Strategy**

First, allocate only 20% of the total funds for the initial position. The obvious benefit of this approach is reducing the impact of a single decision error. If the judgment is wrong and a 10% loss occurs, stop loss immediately; the actual total fund loss is only 2%.

Conversely, if the market moves as expected? A 10% profit triggers an additional position, adding 20% of the funds. Each subsequent 10% increase in price continues to add 20%, and on the third addition, invest directly with 40%, expanding the winning results. As long as the price does not fall more than 10%, hold the position; once the decline reaches 10%, close all positions to stop loss.

**Core Concept Analysis**

The brilliance of this framework lies in: using small trial-and-error costs to verify the correctness of trading logic, then gradually increasing positions to seize trend opportunities. Risks are minimized, while profits can be exponentially amplified. This approach draws on the classic philosophy of speculator Jesse Livermore—let winners keep winning, and cut losses quickly on failures.

Of course, theory is one thing; in actual execution, market variables are numerous. This method can significantly improve profitability over long-term practice, but it’s not foolproof. Its value lies in systematic risk management, not risk elimination. Many traders become “leeks” (small investors) mainly because they lack methods and discipline.

Trading contracts must adhere to a methodology; blindly going all-in only accelerates losses. This framework can serve as a reference starting point, continuously optimized and iterated in live trading.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
failed_dev_successful_apevip
· 6h ago
Another bloody all-in case, losing 4000u directly is really brutal. To be honest, I also use this 20% initial position and add-on framework; it has really saved me several times. It's mainly a matter of mindset. The key is how many people can actually stick to a 10% stop loss... most just endure and wait for a reversal.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 6h ago
To be honest, the 20% opening position strategy sounds good, but how many can really stick to it? The guy I know is just like that. He initially agreed to follow the plan, but when he saw a 20% increase, he went all in, and in the end, he suffered heavy losses.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoyvip
· 6h ago
Honestly, losing 4000U entirely is a bit harsh. You really need to quit the all-in thing.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmarevip
· 6h ago
To put it nicely, it's risk management; frankly, it still requires strict discipline. Otherwise, even the best framework is useless.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6cvip
· 6h ago
That's reasonable, but very few people can actually execute according to this framework. Most just go all-in when a market rally comes...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)