🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
There's something worth examining here. When builders talk about projects like Irys, iDos, Allora, Boost, Monad, Everlyn, Hey Elsa, Covalent, and Project Merlin—are they making calculated bets or just riding hype? The "yap to earn" mentality has infiltrated crypto discourse more than we'd like to admit. What separates genuine conviction from noise? If you've genuinely tracked these projects, understood their mechanics, analyzed their tokenomics—that's different from casual shilling. But let's be real: how many actually did the work? The ones who committed serious attention to these ecosystems are playing a different game than those just listing names. The real question isn't whether supporting multiple projects is lazy—it's whether you understand what you're actually backing.