The Aave community recently held a crucial vote, with the core issue being the transfer of control over brand assets from a third party to the DAO. After the results were announced, the opposition outnumbered the supporters — opposition votes reached 994,800, accounting for 55.29%, while support votes were only 63,000, making up 41.21% of abstentions.



This proposal failed to pass, reflecting divisions within the community. Supporters believe that the current situation has hidden risks: brand assets are controlled by a third party, which could lead to uncontrollable risks in the long run. They hope that by establishing a legal DAO structure, the ownership and usage rights of brand assets can be clarified at the institutional level, making everything more transparent.

However, the voting results indicate that more people are still willing to accept the current arrangement or have reservations about the proposed changes. This is quite interesting — the same goal of decentralization, aimed at protecting community interests, has led to significant disagreements in implementation. Whether the community will continue to push forward with related proposals or revise and re-propose plans remains to be seen.
AAVE2.32%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
shadowy_supercodervip
· 2h ago
55% opposition is just 5 points away; I feel that adjusting the plan a bit could pass.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollectorvip
· 2h ago
55% oppose this much, it seems everyone still doesn't quite trust this radical reform --- It's the same deadlock again, the eternal battle between reformers and conservatives --- To be honest, the current arrangement, although risky, is at least stable... Who knows what will happen after the change --- DAO governance like this every day, the voting ratio can easily reverse, how to ensure decision stability? --- 99,000 opposition votes are really a lot, it seems the community isn't that opposed to third-party control --- Wait, 41% abstain? That ratio is a bit off, a bunch of people are non-committal --- Feels like there's still information asymmetry, otherwise it wouldn't be so divided --- Decentralization ≠ everything needs to be changed, some things should stay stable once they are settled
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 2h ago
It's another case of decentralized involution; playing around with it all feels equally hard to please. With Aave's vote count being so lopsided, it seems most people just trust third parties a bit more. How should I put it? Decentralization sounds great in theory, but actually implementing it can be a bit frustrating. Brand control is still a sensitive issue, and I understand the conservative perspective. Let's wait and see how they adjust the plan later; they probably will keep tinkering.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnReadvip
· 2h ago
Wait, 55% opposition and you say it's community disagreement? That's not disagreement; that's clearly saying no. Most people think it's fine the way it is now, but they still want to fuss over something. It's about decentralization and transparency again, but in the end, nobody buys it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt