🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
The Aave community recently held a crucial vote, with the core issue being the transfer of control over brand assets from a third party to the DAO. After the results were announced, the opposition outnumbered the supporters — opposition votes reached 994,800, accounting for 55.29%, while support votes were only 63,000, making up 41.21% of abstentions.
This proposal failed to pass, reflecting divisions within the community. Supporters believe that the current situation has hidden risks: brand assets are controlled by a third party, which could lead to uncontrollable risks in the long run. They hope that by establishing a legal DAO structure, the ownership and usage rights of brand assets can be clarified at the institutional level, making everything more transparent.
However, the voting results indicate that more people are still willing to accept the current arrangement or have reservations about the proposed changes. This is quite interesting — the same goal of decentralization, aimed at protecting community interests, has led to significant disagreements in implementation. Whether the community will continue to push forward with related proposals or revise and re-propose plans remains to be seen.