Canton Coin rises 27% in a week; depository institutions promote government bond tokenization as a driving force

2025-12-26 03:20:08

Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】Canton Coin has increased by 27% in the past week, showing remarkable performance and far surpassing the overall market trend. What is the main driving force behind this surge? A deposit trust and clearing institution announced that it will tokenize some US Treasuries on the Canton network. In simple terms, it is a combination of traditional finance and the on-chain world. The Canton network itself is tailored for regulated financial institutions, specifically for issuing and settling tokenized real-world assets. These types of RWA tokenization projects have always been regarded as an important direction in the crypto market, and institutional-level compliance endorsements often attract market attention.

RWA-1.01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TopEscapeArtist

· 2h ago

This MACD golden cross is indeed quite strong, but I see the warning signs of a head and shoulders top... A 27% increase, I bet 5 bucks that this is just a feast for the high-positioned bagholders. RWA tokenization sounds high-end, but in reality, it's just institutions setting a trap for retail investors. I dare not buy the dip.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 2h ago

A 27% increase is indeed attractive, but can this kind of institutional endorsement really sustain long-term growth? --- The RWA concept has been talked about for so long, and finally real money is entering the market. --- Tokenizing government bonds? Sounds high-end, but it feels more like traditional finance testing the limits of Web3. --- Depository institutions playing with tokens, with compliance backing—next step, maybe ETFs are coming too. --- Canton’s move definitely has some substance, but don’t forget where the regulatory sword is hanging. --- Is the rush to enter just because institutions are involved? I’d rather see actual locked-up volume and trading depth first. --- Haha, isn’t this just CeFi wrapped in DeFi? Essentially still centralized. --- A 27% rise—are we at the bottom or is this just a scam coin trick? --- Tokenizing government bonds—called innovation in a good way, but in a bad way, it’s just traditional finance playing new tricks to fleece investors. --- I believe in Canton, but I don’t think that 27% can hold up.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 2h ago

There are indeed developments in RWA, but I'm afraid it might just be another round of hype. Can Canton hold up this time, or will it just cut and run like last time? Tokenization of government bonds sounds impressive, but let's see how it actually performs in practice. A 27% weekly increase—how many people are chasing the high? Can institutional backing alone drive a price up? Then why isn't BTC showing any movement? It seems that positive news like this can be easily overhyped; be cautious about taking the bait. Can Canton become the next RWA leader? Let's observe for now. Wait, is this custodian really reliable?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 2h ago

rwa tokenization is just traditional finance's latest spell... watch the liquidity pools carefully, something's brewing in those dark corners

Reply0

ShamedApeSeller

· 3h ago

Government bonds on the blockchain? Traditional finance is really about to be stirred up now, Canton has caught the wave I've been optimistic about the RWA track for a long time; institutional entry is a clear signal A 27% increase isn't much; the real start is when big funds come in I'm a bit worried about being held back by regulators... but with compliance backing here, it should be fine Canton Network's setup sounds very professional; its reliability is indeed higher than that of most public chains

View OriginalReply0