Constellation Brands or PepsiCo: Which Consumer Staple Stock Deserves Your Portfolio?

Two Consumer Giants Stumble While Market Surges Forward

Constellation Brands (NYSE: STZ) and PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) have long held reputations as defensive plays for risk-averse investors seeking stability. Yet both stocks have disappointed shareholders over recent years. While the S&P 500 climbed more than 40% in the past two years, Constellation’s shares have collapsed by over 40%, and PepsiCo has retreated 10%. Understanding why these established consumer staples underperformers are losing traction—and whether either warrants a fresh look—requires examining their distinct operational challenges.

The Erosion of Constellation’s Beer Dynasty

Once the world’s dominant force in the alcoholic beverage sector, Constellation Brands generates the bulk of its revenue from beer production. Its portfolio spans over 100 drink brands, with flagship beers like Modelo, Corona, and Pacifico leading sales. Wines and spirits—including Kim Crawford and Casa Noble Tequila—round out its revenue streams.

Yet Constellation’s growth trajectory has stalled considerably. The beer category itself faces structural headwinds. American consumers, particularly younger demographics, are drinking less beer than prior generations, a secular shift that no single company can reverse. Additionally, Hispanic consumers—historically responsible for roughly half of Constellation’s beer sales—have tightened spending as macroeconomic uncertainty and political friction intensified. The Trump administration’s tariff increases on aluminum imports have further squeezed margins for Constellation’s Mexican beer imports.

The company has attempted diversification into hard seltzers and non-alcoholic alternatives to capture younger buyers, yet these emerging categories cannot offset the steady contraction of its core beer franchises. On the spirits and wines side, Constellation divested lower-margin brands to concentrate on premium offerings, a strategic pivot that paradoxically depressed overall revenues and accelerated its sales slowdown.

For fiscal 2026 (ending February), management projects beer sales to decline 2%-4%, wine and spirits to drop 17%-20%, and total organic sales to slip 4%-6%. Wall Street estimates a steeper revenue decline of 11% with adjusted EPS falling 4%. For 2027, analysts anticipate revenue stabilization but with modest EPS growth of 8% as the company right-sizes underperforming divisions.

At $140 per share, the stock trades at roughly 10 times next-year earnings and yields 2.9% in forward dividends—seemingly inexpensive. Yet multiple expansion will remain elusive until Constellation demonstrates it can stabilize the beer business and successfully restructure its smaller segments.

PepsiCo Navigates Margin Compression and Portfolio Bloat

PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) confronts a different set of operational pressures. While its beverage segment has held relatively steady, its packaged food arm—anchored by Quaker Foods and Frito-Lay—faces mounting strain. Quaker endured damaging product recalls, encountered sluggish demand in China and Latin America, and exhausted traditional cost-control tactics like package shrinkage and price increases to counteract inflation.

For 2025, PepsiCo guidance calls for “low single-digit” organic sales growth, with core comparable EPS flat on a constant currency basis. Elevated tariffs, consumer caution, and intensifying competitive pressure from rival food makers explain this cautious outlook.

The lackluster trajectory caught the eye of Elliot Management, which accumulated a $4 billion stake in September and began pushing for strategic change. The activist investor wants PepsiCo to eliminate approximately 20% of its product lineup, concentrate resources on core brands, reduce pricing to enhance competitiveness, and slash costs through facility consolidation and workforce reductions. Elliot also advocates adopting Coca-Cola’s asset-light model, outsourcing production to third-party bottlers rather than maintaining captive operations.

Such restructuring could unlock stronger revenue and profit expansion in the medium term. However, 2025 remains transitional—analysts project merely 2% revenue growth with flat adjusted EPS. By 2026, as transformation initiatives take root, expectations rise to 4% revenue growth and 5% EPS expansion.

Trading at $150, PepsiCo carries a valuation of 18 times forward earnings with a 3.8% forward yield, appearing reasonably priced. Yet like Constellation, the stock faces a waiting period until management credibly addresses its core operational challenges.

Head-to-Head: Why PepsiCo Holds the Edge

Selecting between these two troubled consumer names requires acknowledging neither makes an urgent buy. However, PepsiCo emerges as the relatively better choice.

Constellation Brands confronts an existential reckoning. Its beer portfolio—the lifeblood of revenue—is shrinking amid secular consumption declines and margin compression from tariffs. Hard seltzers and non-alcoholic variants offer limited lifelines. The company requires breakthrough innovation or market-share gains that seem unlikely in the near term.

PepsiCo, by contrast, faces operational challenges without fundamental business model threats. Cost reduction, portfolio pruning, and operational restructuring are achievable objectives with clear precedent in the industry. Coca-Cola’s success with outsourced bottling demonstrates the feasibility of PepsiCo’s potential transformation blueprint. The company isn’t reinventing itself; it’s optimizing what exists.

Both stocks will likely languish until meaningful progress materializes, but PepsiCo’s trajectory offers more conviction than Constellation’s desperate search for relevance.