2025-12-24 16:24:51

DeFi has proven one thing: finance fundamentally does not require intermediaries. But now there is a deeper issue at hand—decision execution.

Humans always make mistakes in financial operations. Emotional fluctuations, inconsistent execution, judgment biases—these are common problems in the financial field. To truly achieve decentralization, a fundamental change is needed in who executes the transactions.

This is the core logic of DeFAI. Instead of continuing to optimize DeFi tools, it’s better to design the executor itself from scratch. A fully decentralized intelligent system that can eliminate human interference, ensuring each transaction strictly follows preset rules. No hesitation, no errors, no detours. Financial actions thus become pure code execution. This is the next evolution direction of blockchain infrastructure.

DEFI-2.29%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaMasked

· 5h ago

It sounds nice, but I feel like this is just turning human errors into bugs in the code.

View OriginalReply0

defi_detective

· 5h ago

Listen up, we still have to rely on AI for trading. As for us newbies, we should just lie low and stay out of the way.

View OriginalReply0

ParallelChainMaxi

· 5h ago

Sounds good, but it might be overthinking. Human "errors" can sometimes be an advantage. --- DeFAI sounds great, but code can also have bugs... who will fix them? --- This logic is a bit idealistic. Who is responsible if the intelligent system encounters problems? --- To put it simply, the real question is: who trusts this system? --- No human intervention sounds free, but it also means no one is responsible for losses. --- Pure code execution? Then when there's a rug pull, there's really no one to save you. --- I'm a bit skeptical. Isn't this just replacing intermediaries with algorithmic ones? --- If it could really be done, I would have already gone all in. The key is that there is currently no fully reliable on-chain AI executor.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTinfoilHat

· 5h ago

That's a pretty good point, but the question is, is AI really reliable? We can't even manage ourselves well. Human emotional fluctuations are indeed a major enemy, but I'm worried that in the end, trust will shift from humans to code. What if the code has bugs? I like this logic, but DeFAI is still a long way from being implemented. To put it simply, it's still a human nature problem. Changing the executor won't solve the fundamental contradiction. Code won't make mistakes? Just look at past flash loan incidents, lol.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureDenied

· 5h ago

Sounds good, but poorly written code still crashes.

View OriginalReply0

MerkleMaid

· 5h ago

Basically, it's about wanting to replace human brains with robots for trading. It sounds great, but I still feel a bit anxious. Letting AI manage my wallet, I can't sleep just thinking about bugs. DeFAI's approach isn't new; it feels like automated trading wrapped in a Web3 shell. The question is, who guarantees that these "preset rules" themselves are problem-free? Code can exclude human interference, but it can't eliminate vulnerabilities within the code itself. Talking about being error-free is ideal, but the real test has yet to come.

View OriginalReply0