Recently, I’ve noticed a rather interesting phenomenon: the money on-chain is getting smarter.



Everyone used to play by the same rules—chasing hot trends, rushing for high APYs, hunting airdrops, and following narratives. But now, it feels like the entire market is moving in a different direction, and users are starting to ask the most fundamental question: Is my asset actually safe here?

This shift sounds simple, but its real impact is quite significant. Many protocols that relied on campaigns and incentives are seeing a noticeable drop in user retention. On the other hand, those infrastructure projects that don’t make a lot of noise but focus on building solid products are quietly seeing their metrics rise.

Falcon Finance is a typical case.

It hasn’t made any big moves lately—no new tasks, no new stories to tell. But on-chain data shows that capital inflows have actually become more stable than before. Why? Because as the market enters this “deep water zone,” users are proactively filtering out protocols that look flashy but feel unreliable, and moving their money to places that can actually handle complex situations.

Falcon happens to be right in that spot.

It’s not winning through marketing—it’s being “voted in” by users with their feet. This growth logic is completely different from before—it’s not about explosive campaigns to attract new users, but about sustained product strength driving retention.

To put it bluntly, the current on-chain environment no longer rewards “loud” projects, but is starting to reward foundational infrastructure that can actually deliver. When the noise dies down, prices fluctuate, and the market cools off, the protocols that have truly solved those three core issues—security, efficiency, and controllability—end up looking more solid.

Falcon’s current state is almost like winning by default—not because it did something particularly right, but because the entire market’s selection mechanism is helping it filter users. This kind of growth isn’t linear—it’s stepwise, moving up a level with each cycle.
FF7.45%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketSagevip
· 17h ago
Indeed, that whole marketing playbook is dead. --- Yet another Falcon hype piece, I'm tired of seeing these. --- You're right, but who isn't saying this now? --- As long as it's stable, who cares how it got there. --- Anyway, I don't believe protocols can just win by doing nothing, it's not that easy. --- This move definitely tapped into market sentiment, thumbs up. --- We still have to look at the TVL data; just talking isn't enough. --- Vote with your feet? Wake up, most people are still gambling. --- The deep end is crowded, competition is even fiercer now. --- Falcon's low-key approach is interesting, but who knows about its sustainability.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetectivevip
· 17h ago
I have to say, I saw this shift in "smart money" coming a long time ago—no one listened to me back then, haha. The real test is just beginning. When the bear market hits, you'll see who's been swimming naked.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Groupvip
· 18h ago
That’s a pretty harsh truth, and it’s true that everyone is starting to do the math now. But this kind of passive "lying flat and winning" logic from Falcon probably can only fool people for a while... The real test is still ahead. It’s good to survive based on the product, but how long can you last without hype?
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntressvip
· 18h ago
To be honest, chasing high APYs now is getting a bit exhausting. The projects that can really survive still depend on fundamentals; sometimes the ones without flashy tricks are actually more stable. Falcon timed this wave pretty well; it really feels like users are coming over on their own. But let's not hype it up too much—when the market cycle turns, no one is immune. We'll just have to wait and see. How long can you rely on just being "resilient"? Ultimately, it's about whether there's real demand to support it. I mean... the "easy win" narrative sounds nice, but reality is probably not that simple. The early advantage of information asymmetry is gone; now it's all about the strength of the product. Feels like everyone is waiting for the next round of reshuffling to see who can really survive this winter.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)