💥 Gate Square Event: #Post0GWinUSDT# 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to 0G or the ongoing campaigns (Earn, CandyDrop, or Contract Trading Competition) for a chance to share 200 USDT rewards!
📅 Event Period: Sept 25, 2025, 18:00 – Oct 2, 2025, 16:00 UTC
📌 Related Campaigns:
Earn: Enjoy stable earnings
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47290
CandyDrop: Claim 0G rewards
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47286
Contract Trading Competition: Trade to win prizes
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47221
📌 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post original cont
Gate Launchpad Phase 4 Plasma (XPL), this time I want to look at it from a different perspective: this is not just about participating in a new project, but the platform is using rules to screen out players who are truly willing to invest.
The rules are simple: the larger the trading volume, the more subscription shares you can obtain. It's as if the platform is asking you: are you willing to pay the cost of increasing your volume in exchange for bigger chips? The key here is not speed or luck, but calculation.
The logic after conversion is as follows:
– By reaching 3 million in transaction volume, it will take about 3,000 U in fees to obtain a full share of 30,000 XPL.
– Subscribe with GUSD, cost 0.35 U/XPL.
– Before the market opened, some people were calling for a range of 0.75–1 U, which translates to a profit of approximately 9,000–16,500 U.
Next, I see three key points:
1. The background of the Plasma public chain, the probability of breaking the issue is low.
2. The cost of brushing volume can be reduced through rebates and grid strategies, making it more economical.
3. Upgrade to VIP1 in advance to basically ensure you can take the full allocation.
Overall, this Launchpad seems more like a "game of efficiency": whoever can exchange the largest share with the least transaction fee cost will be able to move the 0.35 chips to the market for 1 U, making the arbitrage process clean and straightforward.