#数字货币市场回调# In light of the recent events surrounding the $GAIN and $MTP projects, I must make an important point: the launch of a Token for trading does not mean one should hold it mindlessly.

$GAIN surged significantly after its launch yesterday, but today it suddenly increased the issuance of tokens; meanwhile, $MTP experienced a situation where market makers suddenly withdrew liquidity. These actions ultimately harm the interests of ordinary users.

We need to question: why does $GAIN need to issue more tokens? The project party claims that the private key has been leaked, but are there serious issues with project management behind this? Similarly, why can the market maker of $MTP withdraw liquidity at will without any constraints?

I suggest that the trading platform should charge a certain margin for the projects that will be launched subsequently. Considering that the projects that can go live in alpha are not small in scale, charging a margin can both restrain the behavior of the project parties and provide basic protection for users.

If the platform does not take any action, in the future, project parties may very likely use excuses such as "hacker attacks" or "unawareness" to evade responsibility after the token price plummets.

I hope @binancezh and @heyi can pay attention to and consider this suggestion to create a safer trading environment for market participants.