Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
$SKYAI This thing has too many head positions, and basically every point used for long positions is funded with dirty money.
So why doesn't it dare to dump the price quickly? Because if it dumps, it can only absorb dirty money; this part of the money can't be washed out.
Currently, it can be said that of the more than 50 million long positions, at least 80% are artificially driven up by the market maker using dirty money.
Otherwise, the market maker's dumping and money laundering efficiency would be greater than the upward push, and they would definitely start dumping.
Moreover, the remaining 20% of "white money" in long positions is more scattered, so the market maker would rather spend more "dirty money costs" to absorb the "empty position white money."
What we need to determine now is approximately where the margin call price for the empty positions is concentrated, and the average distribution of long positions.
According to smart money, the median is around 0.37, and the median margin call price for empty positions is around 0.9.
The current question is: at which point will the efficiency of dumping money laundering surpass the efficiency of continuous upward laundering?
Honestly, a large part of this dirty money might not be washed out immediately and could be left for the next round of trading to continue washing.
They can wash a little at a time.
In this situation, it’s not necessary to wait until all dirty money is washed out before pulling out; instead, it depends on whether dumping or continued upward pushing has higher laundering efficiency.
This should be the underlying logic of this trading bot setup.
So we hope some data experts can help us analyze where that balance point actually is.
Most likely, once reaching that point, they will dump, or at a lucky number nearby, such as 0.88888.
Where do you think the balance point of laundering efficiency is?