
A cryptocurrency attack refers to malicious actions aimed at stealing or compromising on-chain assets.
These attacks fall into two broad categories: those targeting individuals, such as phishing links, fake airdrops, and impersonated customer support, which trick users into revealing their private keys or mnemonic phrases (the equivalent of account passwords), or luring them to approve token permissions that allow attackers to spend their tokens; and those targeting code or infrastructure, including exploiting smart contract vulnerabilities, cross-chain bridge flaws, price oracle manipulation, and even hash power attacks on smaller blockchains.
The result is often the irreversible transfer of assets. Once funds are moved on-chain, they are typically unrecoverable due to the immutable nature of blockchain transactions—this is the key difference from traditional internet theft.
Because once compromised, losses are usually irreversible and can happen within seconds.
Crypto assets do not rely on banks for loss recovery. If your private key or wallet authorization is abused, attackers can directly transfer your tokens without further confirmation. Beginners are especially vulnerable when claiming airdrops, minting NFTs, or interacting with new DApps—they may let their guard down and sign suspicious approvals.
In terms of financial impact, single incidents can range from hundreds of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars. For example, in May 2024, Japanese exchange DMM Bitcoin lost approximately $305 million from a hot wallet theft. Such cases highlight that both individuals and institutions face significant risk.
They typically follow three main paths: stealing keys, tricking authorizations, and exploiting vulnerabilities.
First, stealing keys. Private keys or mnemonic phrases serve as the master access to accounts. If leaked via fake websites, malicious plugins, or impersonated support, attackers can fully control your wallet. Common tactics include posing as support agents and prompting you to enter your mnemonic phrase for “account verification.”
Second, tricking authorizations. A wallet popup requesting authorization essentially grants spending rights for a specific token to a contract or app. If you approve unlimited permissions on a malicious site, attackers can drain your tokens in the background without further action from you.
Third, exploiting vulnerabilities. Smart contracts are programs deployed on-chain. Logical errors, weak access controls, or poorly handled external dependencies (such as price oracles) can be leveraged by attackers. Typical exploits include manipulating price feeds, using flash loans to amplify capital, or triggering faulty contract pathways to siphon funds. Cross-chain bridges are especially vulnerable; flaws in proof or multisig processes can result in large-scale asset loss due to their role in reconciling assets between chains.
The most frequent scenarios include wallet connections, DeFi interactions, NFT minting, cross-chain transfers, and exchange account security.
In DeFi, users interact with wallets for liquidity mining or lending. Visiting phishing sites or granting excessive token permissions can lead to assets being stolen in the background. During peak periods, fake “airdrop check” pages may prompt users to sign multiple transactions.
For cross-chain bridges, errors in validation or multisig management can allow attackers to forge “cross-chain proofs” and withdraw large amounts of locked assets in one go. Historically, bridge exploits have resulted in losses of hundreds of millions of dollars, often due to mismanaged key signatures.
In NFT and social platform scenarios, attackers use fake airdrops, false minting links, or impersonate key opinion leaders (KOLs) via private messages to lure users into approving “all NFTs.” This leads to bulk NFT theft.
On centralized exchanges, the main risk is account takeover. For example, at Gate, if your email password and 2FA protection are weak, attackers may use credential stuffing and social engineering to access your account, change security settings, and withdraw funds. Therefore, platform-side protections are equally critical.
Take steps across four layers: accounts, wallets, contract interactions, and devices.
Step 1: Protect private keys and mnemonic phrases. Never enter your mnemonic phrase in chat windows, forms, or “support” pages; use hardware wallets for long-term storage; separate “hot wallets” (for daily use) from “cold wallets” (for long-term holding).
Step 2: Apply the principle of least authorization. Only authorize trusted DApps; prefer limited token approvals; regularly revoke unused permissions via your wallet or a block explorer. Be wary of requests to “authorize all tokens.”
Step 3: Verify website and software sources. Download wallets and browser plugins only from official sites or reputable stores; cross-check links via official Twitter, Discord channels, or verified documentation. Pause and check domains when prompted for “urgent updates” or “limited-time airdrops.”
Step 4: Secure exchange accounts. Enable two-factor authentication (2FA), withdrawal whitelist, and anti-phishing codes on platforms like Gate; require email and phone confirmation for important actions; test small withdrawals before large ones; use separate accounts or sub-accounts to isolate risk.
Step 5: Review contracts before interacting. Check if the project publishes its contract address and third-party audit reports; verify if the contract is open source and whether it has upgradeable proxy permissions via a block explorer; use read-only wallets for observation when necessary.
Step 6: Maintain device and network hygiene. Keep your system and browser updated; avoid large transactions over public/untrusted Wi-Fi; dedicate a device or browser profile specifically for crypto operations.
Step 7: Establish an emergency response plan. If you detect abnormal authorizations, immediately revoke permissions and transfer assets; if your account is compromised, freeze it via Gate and contact official support channels—never share sensitive information through chat apps.
As of early 2026, industry reports show that most incidents still stem from private key leaks and malicious authorizations, with single-case losses typically ranging from millions to tens of millions of dollars. Annual totals follow the pattern of “few large cases plus many small cases.”
For context, in May 2024 Japan’s DMM Bitcoin suffered a $305 million hot wallet theft; cross-chain bridge exploits and contract bugs remain common in recent years. However, leading bridges have reduced major incident frequency by strengthening validation and multisig management. Ransomware and social engineering have rebounded recently—indicating that “tricking users into authorizing or sharing keys” is more prevalent than “exploiting code.”
Regulatory tracking is improving: chain analysis tools and blacklist integrations react faster now—some stolen funds are flagged and frozen within hours—forcing attackers to rely more on cross-chain swaps and mixing services to disperse assets. This raises their operational costs.
Note: Authoritative annual summaries for 2025–early 2026 are usually published after year-end; refer to official security firm and chain analytics reports for precise figures. For individual users, this means you should pay closer attention to social engineering and authorization-based threats in daily operations.
The terms are often used interchangeably but emphasize different aspects: attacks typically involve technical or permission exploitation; scams focus on social engineering and deception.
Technical attacks directly exploit code flaws, key management mistakes, or network misconfigurations—like smart contract bugs, cross-chain bridge validation issues, or hot wallet key leaks. These require no interaction with victims beyond finding a system vulnerability.
Scams target people by gaining trust through fake customer support, false airdrops, fraudulent investment groups, etc., then stealing mnemonic phrases or tricking users into unlimited authorizations. The technical barrier is low—success depends on persuasive tactics and scenario setup.
In practice, these methods often combine: attackers lure you to fake sites with social tricks then use technical scripts to mass transfer assets. The best defense is twofold: protect yourself from social threats (never reveal keys or grant excessive permissions) and technical risks (use hardware wallets, review contracts, enable exchange security features).
Recovery depends on attack type and response speed. If your private key was leaked and tokens were stolen on-chain, recovery is nearly impossible since blockchain transactions are irreversible; if your exchange account was hacked, immediate contact with the platform to freeze your account may help recover some funds. Always record transaction hashes promptly and report incidents to relevant platforms for investigation.
New users often lack security awareness and make mistakes such as clicking phishing links, using weak passwords, transacting over public Wi-Fi, or sharing mnemonic phrases with strangers. Attackers target beginners because it requires little effort with high success rates. Improving security awareness, using hardware wallets, and enabling two-factor authentication greatly reduce attack risk.
Both private keys and mnemonic phrases are equally vital—they grant full access to your assets. Passwords only protect account login access. The safest practice is to store private keys and mnemonic phrases offline (written on paper or stored in cold wallets), set strong unique passwords for accounts, and never keep all three together.
Hardware wallets greatly enhance security but are not foolproof. Their main advantage is offline private key storage and requiring physical confirmation for transactions—making remote theft difficult. However, you should still avoid connecting wallets on public devices, purchase only from official channels, and be cautious with firmware updates. Think of hardware wallets as bank vaults—you must still safeguard the key.
Step one: stop all transactions immediately; change your password and reset two-factor authentication settings. Step two: review account history and wallet balances—record any suspicious transaction hashes. Step three: if an exchange account is affected, contact official support at once to freeze your account. Step four: enable IP whitelist and withdrawal limits on platforms like Gate to prevent further losses. Preserve all evidence for potential legal recourse.


