【Block Rhythm】Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently shared his views on personal privacy on social media. He stated that he has consistently supported the development and use of privacy tools, not only because he believes privacy itself is important, but also because he has personally experienced the value of these tools.
In his view, there is a widespread misconception in current society: many people believe that personal privacy can be arbitrarily disclosed, but governments and law enforcement agencies need to possess information on all citizens to maintain order. Vitalik explicitly opposed this viewpoint. He pointed out that in reality, government databases are frequently hacked, and large amounts of sensitive information eventually flow to foreign hostile forces. This precisely demonstrates that centralized large-scale information storage itself carries enormous risks.
Vitalik also shared his personal experience using privacy tools. When purchasing software for personal use, his name would never be entered into any corporate database. What does this mean? It means users have true choice, controlling their own information. What’s more noteworthy is that even if development of these tools has stopped for years, they can still function normally — this reflects the resilience of decentralized applications.
This argument touches on a core concern that has long preoccupied the Web3 community: in the digital age, who should ultimately own personal data sovereignty.
Halaman ini mungkin berisi konten pihak ketiga, yang disediakan untuk tujuan informasi saja (bukan pernyataan/jaminan) dan tidak boleh dianggap sebagai dukungan terhadap pandangannya oleh Gate, atau sebagai nasihat keuangan atau profesional. Lihat Penafian untuk detailnya.
19 Suka
Hadiah
19
6
Posting ulang
Bagikan
Komentar
0/400
LayerZeroHero
· 01-12 04:29
Buktinya, basis data terpusat adalah bom waktu... Risiko keamanan pemerintah lebih banyak daripada pasar gelap
Lihat AsliBalas0
AirdropNinja
· 01-12 03:47
v神这波说得太对了,集中式数据库就是蜜罐
Balas0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 01-09 12:15
V大 ini ngomong nggak salah, database pemerintah sudah dibobol berkali-kali masih mau kita percaya... tertawa
Lihat AsliBalas0
PumpDetector
· 01-09 07:25
vitalik benar-benar di sini mengajarkan apa yang telah kita ketahui sejak mt. gox... terpusat = rekt. basis data pemerintah diretas di kiri dan kanan, ya tidak terima kasih
Lihat AsliBalas0
just_vibin_onchain
· 01-09 07:22
V-God rights, sentralisasi database adalah bom waktu.
Benar, pemerintah menyimpan data tidak sebaik saya menguasainya sendiri, setidaknya saya tidak akan diretas.
Privasi sama sekali bukan barang mewah, itu hak asasi manusia.
Belanja harus lapor nama? Maka saya akan pakai nama samaran deh haha.
Audit algoritma, penjualan data, itu ancaman sejati.
Tidak semua orang ingin transparan ke pemerintah.
V-God menang lagi, saya dukung privasi pertama.
Ucapan ini seharusnya sudah dikatakan orang lebih dulu, sangat memuaskan.
Database pemerintah diretas berkali-kali, masih mau kelola informasi seluruh rakyat? Lucu sekali.
Alat privasi bukan untuk berbuat jahat, hanya ingin hidup seperti manusia.
Privasi tidak boleh dilanggar: Pendiri bersama Ethereum membahas pentingnya keamanan data pribadi
【Block Rhythm】Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently shared his views on personal privacy on social media. He stated that he has consistently supported the development and use of privacy tools, not only because he believes privacy itself is important, but also because he has personally experienced the value of these tools.
In his view, there is a widespread misconception in current society: many people believe that personal privacy can be arbitrarily disclosed, but governments and law enforcement agencies need to possess information on all citizens to maintain order. Vitalik explicitly opposed this viewpoint. He pointed out that in reality, government databases are frequently hacked, and large amounts of sensitive information eventually flow to foreign hostile forces. This precisely demonstrates that centralized large-scale information storage itself carries enormous risks.
Vitalik also shared his personal experience using privacy tools. When purchasing software for personal use, his name would never be entered into any corporate database. What does this mean? It means users have true choice, controlling their own information. What’s more noteworthy is that even if development of these tools has stopped for years, they can still function normally — this reflects the resilience of decentralized applications.
This argument touches on a core concern that has long preoccupied the Web3 community: in the digital age, who should ultimately own personal data sovereignty.